Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 16:27
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Doesn't Musk hire Security for his Tesla dealerships?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
After a series of tumors, woman’s odd-looking tongue explains everything - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How many downloads does an iOS app need to get into the top charts in education?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Childhood Trauma Rewires the Brain Through Inflammation - Neuroscience News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What do men find attractive in an older woman?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: